Are You Ready For the “Silver Tsunami”?


(photo credit: ‘All About Eve’, 1950)

As a card carrying member of the Silver Tsunami, I am quite aware of our aging workforce.  Just looking around my own organization, not only are there a lot of fellow Baby Boomers (born between 1946 – 1964), but we also employ a healthy share of Traditionalists (born between 1922 – 1943).

According to Arlene Hirsch in 4 Ways for HR to Overcome Aging Workforce Issues (SHRM 10.11.17), “Ten thousand Baby Boomers turn 65 every day—a trend that began in 2011 and will continue until 2030.  Despite their reputation for being workaholics, their average retirement age is 61 to 65, which means that the workplace needs to prepare for a veritable tidal wave of turnover (ergo, the Silver Tsunami).”

And as Bette Davis so poignantly once said, we’d better fasten our seat belts, because the bumpy night is now upon us, as millions of jobs will become available due to the Boomers retiring, and millions of new jobs will be created.  According to a Georgetown University report, the number of younger workers with education and skills to replace Boomers isn’t large enough or growing fast enough to make up for these departures.

Strategies to HELP!

One of the strategies we’ve employed is to offer flexible and part-time opportunities to employees who may otherwise have retired.  We continue the transfer of knowledge to other workers, so when someone wishes to totally retire, we’re better positioned to absorb that knowledge and skill impact.  Our organization’s culture is one which truly embraces the two most vulnerable generations, Baby Boomers and Traditionalists; this is due to a savvy and forward thinking top of the house.  Sadly, this thinking is not broadly practiced in most of today’s workplaces.  Unfortunately, just the opposite typically occurs.

Our CEO has a passion for developing emerging leaders in our organization, which also helps fortify us against these inevitable departures of older workers.  He actively reaches out and invites talented employees to meet with him as he helps to begin to hone their leadership skills and emotional intelligence.  He seeks out and provides opportunities both inside and outside the organization for these folks to learn and grow.  Admittedly, this might be a bit easier to accomplish in our small organization and a tad more challenging to pull off in a huge private sector employer.

Another strategy to consider is for a Baby Boomer to reach out and mentor someone (or two) in your organization.  You don’t need to wait for a formal mentoring program to be created.  In fact, research has shown formal mentoring programs to be ineffective; instead, the concept of having or being a mentor or buddy itself, is quite beneficial.  ‘Reverse mentoring’ where, for example, a Millennial mentors a Baby Boomer, instructing on new technology, software, etc. is a ‘two-fer’, i.e., both are learning from each other.

Challenge your Baby Boomers to be pro-active in sharing their knowledge and skills with younger workers.  Consider making it one of their SMART goals for the year.  Look to infuse these ‘exchanges’ in your project teams, research, presentations, reports, etc.  And finally, remember to recognize and reward your mentors, buddies, and coaches for their efforts.

Take Stock of Your Talent Portfolio

Take stock of your Baby Boomer talent.  Some you will want to retain, others, not so much.  For the ones you want to retain a bit longer, make it worth their while.  If their current workload is too great, reduce it or restructure the job so it’s more bearable. Utilize part-time, compressed, and alternative work schedules – pilot and experiment.  Consider hiring these folks seasonally or as on-call floaters – these folks’ pictures are in the dictionary next to the words, “on time”, “never takes a sick day”, “reliable” (you get my drift).  Take a look at how many hours one needs to work to become benefits-eligible.  Now is the time to take stock of your organization’s talent and see if there may be opportunities to re-balance your organization’s talent portfolio.

Good luck.

the HRMeister

To Fit or Not To Fit


Organizational Culture Fit

Last week, I attended two webinars.  One was entitled, ‘Hiring for Team Fit’ by Ann Hogan Consulting, the other, SnackNation’s ‘2017 State of Company Culture.’  While many of us (myself included) are trying to hire folks for our organizations who will ‘fit’ and mesh well with our cultures, we might wish to take a step back and reflect on this for a while.

SnackNation made the point that “Myth #2 – Culture is all about hiring for the “right fit” and finding people who all get along.  Reality: Neither your culture nor your company benefit from an organization of only like-minded people.

Hmm…I thought organizational culture fit = retention of our talent, no?

SnackNation states: “In fact the opposite is true. Your organization benefits from a diverse team who bring in outside viewpoints that augment your culture with new ideas, rather than entrench existing biases. Diversity helps you eliminate blind spots and pitfalls like group think.  Likewise, a healthy level of dissent is necessary to arrive at the right solution, not just the one of least resistance.  Think of it this way – culture isn’t the absence of problems, culture is the way you solve problems.”

While this appears to make sense, will ‘different-minded’ people be satisfied and/or engaged in an organization where they may be perceived as ‘outliers’ by others?

If culture is the way an organization solves problems, and ‘different-minded’ people help solve problems quicker, better, and, perhaps, in a more cost-effective manner, will that trump whether they will be accepted and ‘fit’ (and play) well with others?

That’s the $64,000 question.  Think back to a time when you were working on a project team where someone’s contributions and style were quite different than yours and others.  If we’re truly honest, at times, particularly under tight deadline pressures, some might have found the ‘different-minded’ person to be a bit irritating at best, and a down right ‘know-it-all’, at worst.

And how might this same person feel about the team or organization he/she joined if some or all of the team did not appear to truly value his/her contributions?

This brings us back ‘full circle’, where if an individual does not feel some level of value, connection, and inclusiveness with the team and organization, over time, they may well leave – and then nobody wins.

Is it possible to find a ‘happy medium’ or the ‘sweet spot’ of ‘different-mindedness?’  How do other teams and organizations, who successfully engage ‘different-minded’ individuals do it?

Today, we have four generations in our  workplaces, which, on the surface, one would think might offer some measure of different-mindedness, so, in effect, maybe we’re not so ‘like-minded’ to begin with?

What do you think?

the HRmeister